Chris Christie, the keynote speaker at the Republican
National Convention and governor of New Jersey, is a public speaker I definitely admire. For the most
part, his ability to persuade stems from pathos. This is because it is easy to
tell he feels very strongly about what he says, and how passionate he is when
he says it. Additionally, he also has a bit of ethos because of the fact that
what he says is heavily backed by his record, and he speaks mostly of what he
has done anyway. From there, he finally has parts of logos because he doesn’t
just use his record; he also uses the effects of his actions to back what he
says. Although a bit of his persuasive abilities stem from pathos, he also
utilizes logos and ethos to persuade the listeners.
My main quality that makes me persuasive is a combination of
logos and ethos. I use logic and facts behind most of what I say, making those
my arguments concise and definite. Additionally, I am able to stand by what I
say, knowing that I either have done or will do what I try to persuade others
to do themselves. The one thing that Christie has that I don’t is the ability
to remain passionate about what I say, maintaining a level of emotion, of
pathos, in my arguments and statements.
so pathos + logos + ethos = ???
ReplyDeleteEach uses a particular method to appeal to different people, and there is no reason one cannot use all three: One can use emotion to entice, logic to persuade, and credibility/actions to substantiate their claims. The combination of the three is just an effective use of persuasion, and has no particular name or title.
Delete